Strongly in favor of this. I'm ok if it's just built jars (not including docker code) but if we think that's possible to do at the same time I'm fine with that as well. I would really like us to have some jars that are officially released, even if they are a pre-1.0 experimental sort of build.
On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 7:53 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <di...@apache.org> wrote: > I think it's a good idea. Thanks for taking care of this, JB! > > What is included in the binary distribution? Just jars or docker too? > > Side note: we should probably adjust PR #1070 [1] since the first release > number is going to be different. > > [1] https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1170 > > Cheers, > Dmitri. > > Thanks, > Dmitri. > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 5:58 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> > wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > > We are working on the 1.0.0 release, with a lot of new features and > fixes. > > > > One important change between 0.9.0 and 1.0.0 is the publication of the > > binary distributions, with all related requirements (LICENSE/NOTICE, > > etc). > > I'm working on the LICENSE/NOTICE and binary distributions publication. > > Considering the time we needed to complete the 0.9.0 release, I think > > it would be great to "anticipate" a little before 1.0.0. It would > > allow us to "accelerate" on the 1.0.0 release and beyond. > > > > I would like to propose the 0.10.0 release, as an "intermediate" > > release. I would like to prepare this release by the end of next week, > > creating the 0.10.x branch (based on the main branch) on Saturday, > > March 22 and cutting the 0.10.0 release on Monday, March 24. > > > > Thoughts ? > > > > Regards > > JB > > >
