The binary distributions are everything we distribute/publish. I would focus on archive (tar.gz/zip), and jar files. As we have a Polaris repo on Docker HUB, I will also include docker image check.
Regards JB On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 1:53 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <di...@apache.org> wrote: > > I think it's a good idea. Thanks for taking care of this, JB! > > What is included in the binary distribution? Just jars or docker too? > > Side note: we should probably adjust PR #1070 [1] since the first release > number is going to be different. > > [1] https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1170 > > Cheers, > Dmitri. > > Thanks, > Dmitri. > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 5:58 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> > wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > > We are working on the 1.0.0 release, with a lot of new features and fixes. > > > > One important change between 0.9.0 and 1.0.0 is the publication of the > > binary distributions, with all related requirements (LICENSE/NOTICE, > > etc). > > I'm working on the LICENSE/NOTICE and binary distributions publication. > > Considering the time we needed to complete the 0.9.0 release, I think > > it would be great to "anticipate" a little before 1.0.0. It would > > allow us to "accelerate" on the 1.0.0 release and beyond. > > > > I would like to propose the 0.10.0 release, as an "intermediate" > > release. I would like to prepare this release by the end of next week, > > creating the 0.10.x branch (based on the main branch) on Saturday, > > March 22 and cutting the 0.10.0 release on Monday, March 24. > > > > Thoughts ? > > > > Regards > > JB > >
