Fully agree Russell. That's the plan :) Thanks ! Regards JB
On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 4:37 PM Russell Spitzer <russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Strongly in favor of this. I'm ok if it's just built jars (not including > docker code) > but if we think that's possible to do at the same time I'm fine with that > as well. > I would really like us to have some jars that are officially released, > even if > they are a pre-1.0 experimental sort of build. > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 7:53 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <di...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > I think it's a good idea. Thanks for taking care of this, JB! > > > > What is included in the binary distribution? Just jars or docker too? > > > > Side note: we should probably adjust PR #1070 [1] since the first release > > number is going to be different. > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1170 > > > > Cheers, > > Dmitri. > > > > Thanks, > > Dmitri. > > > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 5:58 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > We are working on the 1.0.0 release, with a lot of new features and > > fixes. > > > > > > One important change between 0.9.0 and 1.0.0 is the publication of the > > > binary distributions, with all related requirements (LICENSE/NOTICE, > > > etc). > > > I'm working on the LICENSE/NOTICE and binary distributions publication. > > > Considering the time we needed to complete the 0.9.0 release, I think > > > it would be great to "anticipate" a little before 1.0.0. It would > > > allow us to "accelerate" on the 1.0.0 release and beyond. > > > > > > I would like to propose the 0.10.0 release, as an "intermediate" > > > release. I would like to prepare this release by the end of next week, > > > creating the 0.10.x branch (based on the main branch) on Saturday, > > > March 22 and cutting the 0.10.0 release on Monday, March 24. > > > > > > Thoughts ? > > > > > > Regards > > > JB > > > > >
