Hi Yufei, > Can you elaborate on it?
I proposed discussing (and elaborating on arguments about) the Generic Tables API in a separate thread. Cheers, Dmitri. On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 5:06 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Dmitri, > > Thanks for chiming in. Are there any volunteers to work on Helm chart > separation and CLI client publishing? > > > The related use cases and the future of them are still not clear > > Can you elaborate on it? The Delta table use case is pretty clear to me > that Polaris can host Delta tables and they are accessible from Spark. > > Yufei > > > On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 1:56 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <di...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Hi Yufei, > > > > Re: Generic Tables API - I do not think it is ready to be a standard > > feature in 1.1. The related use cases and the future of them are still > not > > clear, as far as I can tell. It may be worth having a separate discussion > > thread for this. > > > > +1 to a separate helm repo (I believe this was discussed in another > thread > > too). > > > > +1 to include CLI into the binary bundle. > > > > Cheers, > > Dmitri. > > > > On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 3:12 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > The timeline LGTM! > > > > > > We’ll need to align on the scope. In addition to several ongoing > features > > > that should be ready by then, like MinIO support and KMS support (PR > > > #1424). There are a few key items(not a complete list) that need > > > discussion: > > > > > > - Generic Table & Catalog Federation Status: We need to decide > whether > > > the generic table feature and catalog federation should be moved out > > of > > > preview. Personally, I’d like to see the generic table feature > > graduate > > > from preview. > > > - Helm Chart Repository & Release Strategy: I propose moving the > Helm > > > Chart to a separate repository and releasing it independently. > > Ideally, > > > this should be in place by the 1.1.0 release. > > > - CLI Client Release: I’d like to include the CLI client within the > > > binary bundle and get it published along with 1.1 release. > > > > > > I'd also propose a dedicated community sync for the 1.1 release. > > Thoughts? > > > > > > Yufei > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 8:22 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <di...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > A mid-August release sounds good to me. > > > > > > > > I've added MinIO-related issues to the milestone: > > > > > > > > * https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/1901 > > > > * https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/1530 > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Dmitri. > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 1:07 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré < > j...@nanthrax.net> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > > > > > I propose to have 1.1.0-incubating release around August 20. > > > > > > > > > > On github: > > > > > 1. I updated 1.1.0 milestone due date > > > > > 2. I will move the open issues still on 1.0.0 milestone to 1.1.0 > > > > > 3. I will close the 1.0.0 milestone (as it has been released) > > > > > > > > > > My main focus is to review/update/improve the release guide and > move > > > > > forward on semi-automatic release. > > > > > > > > > > Thoughts ? > > > > > > > > > > If you agree, feel free to create/assign issues for the 1.1.0 > > > milestone. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks ! > > > > > Regards > > > > > JB > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
