heads up: the Credential refresh (config) PR [2341] LGTM. If there are no
more comments, I propose to merge tomorrow.

[2341] https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/2341

Cheers,
Dmitri.

On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 3:28 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
wrote:

> Hi
>
> I propose to have tomorrow as deadline for PRs to include in
> 1.1.0-incubating: everything not blocker will be bump to
> 1.2.0-incubating (thanks to your monthly release cycle).
>
> Thanks!
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 7:38 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Dennis
> >
> > I agree, let's include 2436 in the 1.1.0 release.
> >
> > Thanks !
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 23, 2025 at 5:36 AM Dennis Huo <huoi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Filed https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/2436 as a 1.1 blocker,
> to
> > > request a FeatureConfiguration that gates the usage of custom s3/sts
> > > endpoints (apologies if I missed an existing FeatureConfiguration flag
> that
> > > otherwise already allows service owners to provide consent or
> non-consent
> > > to Catalog users specifying custom endpoints).
> > >
> > > If this is a duplicate or already fixed please feel free to close it as
> > > such; I just wanted to make sure it's tracked earlier rather than
> later in
> > > case we don't have a gate yet, and a cursory search over
> > > FeatureConfiguration didn't show any obvious feature gates.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 1:43 PM Prashant Singh
> > > <prashant.si...@snowflake.com.invalid> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1  from my end, on adding 2341 on the milestone of 1.1.0 there a
> couple
> > > > users in the iceberg slack for polaris too who are looking forward
> to this
> > > > feature
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 1:14 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <
> di...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi All,
> > > > >
> > > > > I see a user-reported issue in slack [1], which I believe is fixed
> by
> > > > > [2341].
> > > > >
> > > > > I propose to include [2341] into 1.1.0. The PR is almost ready. I
> > > > > proactively added it to the 1.1.0 milestone.
> > > > >
> > > > > WDYT?
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> https://apache-polaris.slack.com/archives/C084QSKD6S2/p1755892664049749?thread_ts=1755796733.378569&cid=C084QSKD6S2
> > > > > [2341] https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/2341
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Dmitri.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 8:13 PM Prashant Singh <
> prashant010...@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hey All,
> > > > > > I would also request to consider getting credentials vending PR
> in,
> > > > > mostly
> > > > > > because a lot of users have raised this issue, for long running
> jobs
> > > > and
> > > > > > are eagerly waiting for it !
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > Prashant Singh
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 4:53 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <
> di...@apache.org>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Just heads up: it looks like credential refresh config [2341]
> is
> > > > almost
> > > > > > > ready. I'm not advocating to hold 1.1.0 for it, but in case it
> is
> > > > > merged
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > > time, it would be good to mention it in release notes.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [2341] https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/2341
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > Dmitri.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 3:28 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
> > > > j...@nanthrax.net>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi folks,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > We currently have 18 issues on the 1.1.0 milestone:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20state%3Aopen%20milestone%3A1.1.0
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > As we are now starting to have monthly releases, I propose
> to bump
> > > > > > > > these GH issues with improvements and proposal labels to the
> 1.2.0
> > > > > > > > milestone (1.2.0-incubating is planned for September).
> > > > > > > > Any objections?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > For the issues with the "bug" label, I don't see anything
> major
> > > > but I
> > > > > > > > would like to give a day for the community to take a look.
> > > > > > > > Can you please take a look at the GH issues with the 1.1.0
> > > > milestone
> > > > > > > > to bump to 1.2.0 (or later) ?
> > > > > > > > Note that we can always include issues for 1.2.0
> (September), 1.3.0
> > > > > > > > (October), etc. We basically ship what we have :)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I will do a new pass tomorrow. I would like to start the
> 1.1.0
> > > > > release
> > > > > > > > process by the end of this week.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks !
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > > > JB
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
>

Reply via email to