Hii Dmitri

About #2197, I think we should aim for the milestone 1.2.0 for this one.

We don't have any open issue or PR for the 1.1.0 milestone, so I'm
moving forward and start the release process.

Thanks !

Regards
JB

On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 9:49 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <di...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> The credential reset PR [2197] is ready to be merged. I did not want to
> rush it, but if we get some more approvals soon, it might be worth
> including it into 1.1.0
>
> [2197] https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/2197
>
> Cheers,
> Dmitri.
>
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 8:24 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > Quick update:
> > 1. We don't have any more pending issues for the 1.1.0 milestone, that's
> > great !
> > 2. We only have two pending PRs for the 1.1.0 milestone:
> > 2.1. https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/2341
> > 2.2. https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1424
> >
> > About #2341, I think it's good to be merged. I will do a review and if
> > no objections, I will merge it.
> > About #1424, as there's still comments to address, I propose to
> > postpone to the 1.2.0 milestone (September release).
> >
> > Thoughts ?
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 4:28 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov
> > <dmitri.bourlatch...@dremio.com.invalid> wrote:
> > >
> > > heads up: the Credential refresh (config) PR [2341] LGTM. If there are no
> > > more comments, I propose to merge tomorrow.
> > >
> > > [2341] https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/2341
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Dmitri.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 3:28 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > I propose to have tomorrow as deadline for PRs to include in
> > > > 1.1.0-incubating: everything not blocker will be bump to
> > > > 1.2.0-incubating (thanks to your monthly release cycle).
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > > Regards
> > > > JB
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 7:38 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Dennis
> > > > >
> > > > > I agree, let's include 2436 in the 1.1.0 release.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks !
> > > > > Regards
> > > > > JB
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, Aug 23, 2025 at 5:36 AM Dennis Huo <huoi...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Filed https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/2436 as a 1.1
> > blocker,
> > > > to
> > > > > > request a FeatureConfiguration that gates the usage of custom
> > s3/sts
> > > > > > endpoints (apologies if I missed an existing FeatureConfiguration
> > flag
> > > > that
> > > > > > otherwise already allows service owners to provide consent or
> > > > non-consent
> > > > > > to Catalog users specifying custom endpoints).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If this is a duplicate or already fixed please feel free to close
> > it as
> > > > > > such; I just wanted to make sure it's tracked earlier rather than
> > > > later in
> > > > > > case we don't have a gate yet, and a cursory search over
> > > > > > FeatureConfiguration didn't show any obvious feature gates.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 1:43 PM Prashant Singh
> > > > > > <prashant.si...@snowflake.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1  from my end, on adding 2341 on the milestone of 1.1.0 there a
> > > > couple
> > > > > > > users in the iceberg slack for polaris too who are looking
> > forward
> > > > to this
> > > > > > > feature
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 1:14 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <
> > > > di...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I see a user-reported issue in slack [1], which I believe is
> > fixed
> > > > by
> > > > > > > > [2341].
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I propose to include [2341] into 1.1.0. The PR is almost
> > ready. I
> > > > > > > > proactively added it to the 1.1.0 milestone.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > WDYT?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [1]
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > >
> > https://apache-polaris.slack.com/archives/C084QSKD6S2/p1755892664049749?thread_ts=1755796733.378569&cid=C084QSKD6S2
> > > > > > > > [2341] https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/2341
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > Dmitri.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 8:13 PM Prashant Singh <
> > > > prashant010...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hey All,
> > > > > > > > > I would also request to consider getting credentials vending
> > PR
> > > > in,
> > > > > > > > mostly
> > > > > > > > > because a lot of users have raised this issue, for long
> > running
> > > > jobs
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > are eagerly waiting for it !
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > > > Prashant Singh
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 4:53 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <
> > > > di...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Just heads up: it looks like credential refresh config
> > [2341]
> > > > is
> > > > > > > almost
> > > > > > > > > > ready. I'm not advocating to hold 1.1.0 for it, but in
> > case it
> > > > is
> > > > > > > > merged
> > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > time, it would be good to mention it in release notes.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > [2341] https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/2341
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > > > > Dmitri.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 3:28 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
> > > > > > > j...@nanthrax.net>
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Hi folks,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > We currently have 18 issues on the 1.1.0 milestone:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > >
> > https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20state%3Aopen%20milestone%3A1.1.0
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > As we are now starting to have monthly releases, I
> > propose
> > > > to bump
> > > > > > > > > > > these GH issues with improvements and proposal labels to
> > the
> > > > 1.2.0
> > > > > > > > > > > milestone (1.2.0-incubating is planned for September).
> > > > > > > > > > > Any objections?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > For the issues with the "bug" label, I don't see anything
> > > > major
> > > > > > > but I
> > > > > > > > > > > would like to give a day for the community to take a
> > look.
> > > > > > > > > > > Can you please take a look at the GH issues with the
> > 1.1.0
> > > > > > > milestone
> > > > > > > > > > > to bump to 1.2.0 (or later) ?
> > > > > > > > > > > Note that we can always include issues for 1.2.0
> > > > (September), 1.3.0
> > > > > > > > > > > (October), etc. We basically ship what we have :)
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I will do a new pass tomorrow. I would like to start the
> > > > 1.1.0
> > > > > > > > release
> > > > > > > > > > > process by the end of this week.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks !
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > > > > > > JB
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > >
> >

Reply via email to