Hi All,

The credential reset PR [2197] is ready to be merged. I did not want to
rush it, but if we get some more approvals soon, it might be worth
including it into 1.1.0

[2197] https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/2197

Cheers,
Dmitri.

On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 8:24 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> Quick update:
> 1. We don't have any more pending issues for the 1.1.0 milestone, that's
> great !
> 2. We only have two pending PRs for the 1.1.0 milestone:
> 2.1. https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/2341
> 2.2. https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1424
>
> About #2341, I think it's good to be merged. I will do a review and if
> no objections, I will merge it.
> About #1424, as there's still comments to address, I propose to
> postpone to the 1.2.0 milestone (September release).
>
> Thoughts ?
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 4:28 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov
> <dmitri.bourlatch...@dremio.com.invalid> wrote:
> >
> > heads up: the Credential refresh (config) PR [2341] LGTM. If there are no
> > more comments, I propose to merge tomorrow.
> >
> > [2341] https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/2341
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Dmitri.
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 3:28 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > I propose to have tomorrow as deadline for PRs to include in
> > > 1.1.0-incubating: everything not blocker will be bump to
> > > 1.2.0-incubating (thanks to your monthly release cycle).
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > > Regards
> > > JB
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 7:38 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Dennis
> > > >
> > > > I agree, let's include 2436 in the 1.1.0 release.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks !
> > > > Regards
> > > > JB
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Aug 23, 2025 at 5:36 AM Dennis Huo <huoi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Filed https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/2436 as a 1.1
> blocker,
> > > to
> > > > > request a FeatureConfiguration that gates the usage of custom
> s3/sts
> > > > > endpoints (apologies if I missed an existing FeatureConfiguration
> flag
> > > that
> > > > > otherwise already allows service owners to provide consent or
> > > non-consent
> > > > > to Catalog users specifying custom endpoints).
> > > > >
> > > > > If this is a duplicate or already fixed please feel free to close
> it as
> > > > > such; I just wanted to make sure it's tracked earlier rather than
> > > later in
> > > > > case we don't have a gate yet, and a cursory search over
> > > > > FeatureConfiguration didn't show any obvious feature gates.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 1:43 PM Prashant Singh
> > > > > <prashant.si...@snowflake.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1  from my end, on adding 2341 on the milestone of 1.1.0 there a
> > > couple
> > > > > > users in the iceberg slack for polaris too who are looking
> forward
> > > to this
> > > > > > feature
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 1:14 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <
> > > di...@apache.org>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I see a user-reported issue in slack [1], which I believe is
> fixed
> > > by
> > > > > > > [2341].
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I propose to include [2341] into 1.1.0. The PR is almost
> ready. I
> > > > > > > proactively added it to the 1.1.0 milestone.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > WDYT?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [1]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > >
> https://apache-polaris.slack.com/archives/C084QSKD6S2/p1755892664049749?thread_ts=1755796733.378569&cid=C084QSKD6S2
> > > > > > > [2341] https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/2341
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Dmitri.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 8:13 PM Prashant Singh <
> > > prashant010...@gmail.com
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hey All,
> > > > > > > > I would also request to consider getting credentials vending
> PR
> > > in,
> > > > > > > mostly
> > > > > > > > because a lot of users have raised this issue, for long
> running
> > > jobs
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > are eagerly waiting for it !
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > > Prashant Singh
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 4:53 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <
> > > di...@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Just heads up: it looks like credential refresh config
> [2341]
> > > is
> > > > > > almost
> > > > > > > > > ready. I'm not advocating to hold 1.1.0 for it, but in
> case it
> > > is
> > > > > > > merged
> > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > time, it would be good to mention it in release notes.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > [2341] https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/2341
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > > > Dmitri.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 3:28 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
> > > > > > j...@nanthrax.net>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Hi folks,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > We currently have 18 issues on the 1.1.0 milestone:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > >
> https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20state%3Aopen%20milestone%3A1.1.0
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > As we are now starting to have monthly releases, I
> propose
> > > to bump
> > > > > > > > > > these GH issues with improvements and proposal labels to
> the
> > > 1.2.0
> > > > > > > > > > milestone (1.2.0-incubating is planned for September).
> > > > > > > > > > Any objections?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > For the issues with the "bug" label, I don't see anything
> > > major
> > > > > > but I
> > > > > > > > > > would like to give a day for the community to take a
> look.
> > > > > > > > > > Can you please take a look at the GH issues with the
> 1.1.0
> > > > > > milestone
> > > > > > > > > > to bump to 1.2.0 (or later) ?
> > > > > > > > > > Note that we can always include issues for 1.2.0
> > > (September), 1.3.0
> > > > > > > > > > (October), etc. We basically ship what we have :)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I will do a new pass tomorrow. I would like to start the
> > > 1.1.0
> > > > > > > release
> > > > > > > > > > process by the end of this week.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thanks !
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > > > > > JB
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > >
>

Reply via email to