Thanks a good point but I would say let's go best effort: if we can integrate Iceberg 1.11.0 for Polaris 1.5.0, we will do that, but we should not wait. If it's not in Polaris 1.5.0, Iceberg 1.11.0 can be integrated in Polaris 1.6.0 (in June).
Regards JB On Tue, May 5, 2026 at 6:40 PM Ajantha Bhat <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi JB, > > It looks like we’re very close to the Iceberg 1.11.0 release based on this > thread <https://lists.apache.org/thread/z6krfw87qft21rt7nfrdh09qg2h03ryf>. > I’d suggest waiting for it to be included in the 1.5.0 release, which > aligns with our timeline. > > - Ajantha > > > On Tue, May 5, 2026 at 9:14 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi JB, > > > > Good idea! > > > > Cheers, > > Dmitri. > > > > On Tue, May 5, 2026 at 11:37 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > As we discussed a few weeks ago, I propose releasing Polaris 1.5.0 next > > > week to maintain our monthly release cadence. > > > > > > We currently have nine open issues for this milestone: > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20state%3Aopen%20milestone%3A1.5.0 > > > > > > I am starting with issue #4367 ( > > > https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/4367) to verify all legal > > aspects > > > before the release. > > > > > > Please update any issues or PRs you would like to include in 1.5.0. I > > plan > > > to begin the release preparation on May 15 if no objections. > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > Regards, > > > JB > > > > > >
