Thanks Ajantha!

I merged and resumed the process.

Regards
JB

On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 8:22 AM Ajantha Bhat <[email protected]> wrote:

> >
> > I created a PR to fix that: https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/4430
> > I will resume the release process as soon as this PR is merged.
>
>
> Hi, JB
> I have reviewed and approved to unblock this release.
> Thanks for the PR.
>
> - Ajantha
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 11:38 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > As discussed, I started the release process for 1.5.0.
> >
> > However, the step 3 of the process (build & publish) failed on the Python
> > CLI publication.
> >
> > I created a PR to fix that: https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/4430
> >
> > I will resume the release process as soon as this PR is merged.
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> > On Wed, May 13, 2026 at 6:44 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > I have completed the triage of GitHub issues and PRs, moving stale
> items
> > > to the 1.6.0 milestone.
> > >
> > > Currently, there are no remaining issues or PRs assigned to the 1.5.0
> > > milestone. I plan to start the 1.5.0 release process tonight (my time).
> > >
> > > If there is anything else you would like to include, please let me
> know.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > JB
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 5:16 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi everyone
> > >>
> > >> I plan to cut the 1.5.0 release on vote on Wednesday night or Thursday
> > >> morning my time.
> > >>
> > >> Please update the milestone on GitHub. I will do triage today.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks!
> > >>
> > >> Regards
> > >> JB
> > >>
> > >> Le jeu. 7 mai 2026 à 00:07, Dmitri Bourlatchkov <[email protected]> a
> > >> écrit :
> > >>
> > >>> Hi All,
> > >>>
> > >>> I believe it is best to re-establish a predictable release cadence
> for
> > >>> May.
> > >>> I see users wondering about that (e.g. in slack). If we have to
> exclude
> > >>> Iceberg 1.11 to get a quicker 1.5.0 release, it will be reasonable
> from
> > >>> my
> > >>> POV.
> > >>>
> > >>> Cheers,
> > >>> Dmitri.
> > >>>
> > >>> On Wed, May 6, 2026 at 5:41 AM Robert Stupp <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> > Hi all,
> > >>> >
> > >>> > +1 on 1.5.0 next week.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > I also second Alex' point, so +1 on excluding Iceberg 1.11.0 from
> the
> > >>> 1.5.0
> > >>> > scope.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Robert
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>> > On Wed, May 6, 2026 at 11:34 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
> > [email protected]>
> > >>> > wrote:
> > >>> >
> > >>> > > Hi Alex
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > That's a good point. Honestly, as we plan Polaris 1.5.0 next
> week,
> > I
> > >>> > would
> > >>> > > suggest to consider Iceberg 1.11.0 for Polaris 1.6.0 (mi June).
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > Regards
> > >>> > > JB
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > On Wed, May 6, 2026 at 8:13 AM Alexandre Dutra <
> [email protected]>
> > >>> > wrote:
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > > Hi all,
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > > If 1.5.0 includes Iceberg 1.11, let’s not forget to incorporate
> > the
> > >>> > > changes
> > >>> > > > already merged in the feature/iceberg-1.11 branch. There also
> > >>> might be
> > >>> > > one
> > >>> > > > or two PRs against that branch that could now be merged (I’m
> AFK
> > >>> at the
> > >>> > > > moment).
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > > Thanks,
> > >>> > > > Alex
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > > Le mer. 6 mai 2026 à 07:10, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
> > [email protected]>
> > >>> a
> > >>> > > > écrit :
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > > > Thanks a good point but I would say let's go best effort: if
> we
> > >>> can
> > >>> > > > > integrate Iceberg 1.11.0 for Polaris 1.5.0, we will do that,
> > but
> > >>> we
> > >>> > > > should
> > >>> > > > > not wait.
> > >>> > > > > If it's not in Polaris 1.5.0, Iceberg 1.11.0 can be
> integrated
> > in
> > >>> > > Polaris
> > >>> > > > > 1.6.0 (in June).
> > >>> > > > >
> > >>> > > > > Regards
> > >>> > > > > JB
> > >>> > > > >
> > >>> > > > > On Tue, May 5, 2026 at 6:40 PM Ajantha Bhat <
> > >>> [email protected]>
> > >>> > > > wrote:
> > >>> > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > Hi JB,
> > >>> > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > It looks like we’re very close to the Iceberg 1.11.0
> release
> > >>> based
> > >>> > on
> > >>> > > > > this
> > >>> > > > > > thread <
> > >>> > > >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/z6krfw87qft21rt7nfrdh09qg2h03ryf
> > >>> > > > > >.
> > >>> > > > > > I’d suggest waiting for it to be included in the 1.5.0
> > release,
> > >>> > which
> > >>> > > > > > aligns with our timeline.
> > >>> > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > - Ajantha
> > >>> > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > On Tue, May 5, 2026 at 9:14 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <
> > >>> > [email protected]
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > > > > wrote:
> > >>> > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > Hi JB,
> > >>> > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > Good idea!
> > >>> > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > Cheers,
> > >>> > > > > > > Dmitri.
> > >>> > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > On Tue, May 5, 2026 at 11:37 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
> > >>> > > > [email protected]>
> > >>> > > > > > > wrote:
> > >>> > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > > Hi everyone,
> > >>> > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > > As we discussed a few weeks ago, I propose releasing
> > >>> Polaris
> > >>> > > 1.5.0
> > >>> > > > > next
> > >>> > > > > > > > week to maintain our monthly release cadence.
> > >>> > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > > We currently have nine open issues for this milestone:
> > >>> > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > >
> > >>> > > > >
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> >
> > >>>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20state%3Aopen%20milestone%3A1.5.0
> > >>> > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > > I am starting with issue #4367 (
> > >>> > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/4367) to
> verify
> > >>> all
> > >>> > > legal
> > >>> > > > > > > aspects
> > >>> > > > > > > > before the release.
> > >>> > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > > Please update any issues or PRs you would like to
> include
> > >>> in
> > >>> > > > 1.5.0. I
> > >>> > > > > > > plan
> > >>> > > > > > > > to begin the release preparation on May 15 if no
> > >>> objections.
> > >>> > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > > Thoughts?
> > >>> > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > > > Regards,
> > >>> > > > > > > > JB
> > >>> > > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > > >
> > >>> > > > > >
> > >>> > > > >
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > >
> > >>> >
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
>

Reply via email to