Hi All, I believe it is best to re-establish a predictable release cadence for May. I see users wondering about that (e.g. in slack). If we have to exclude Iceberg 1.11 to get a quicker 1.5.0 release, it will be reasonable from my POV.
Cheers, Dmitri. On Wed, May 6, 2026 at 5:41 AM Robert Stupp <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > +1 on 1.5.0 next week. > > I also second Alex' point, so +1 on excluding Iceberg 1.11.0 from the 1.5.0 > scope. > > Robert > > > On Wed, May 6, 2026 at 11:34 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi Alex > > > > That's a good point. Honestly, as we plan Polaris 1.5.0 next week, I > would > > suggest to consider Iceberg 1.11.0 for Polaris 1.6.0 (mi June). > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > On Wed, May 6, 2026 at 8:13 AM Alexandre Dutra <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > If 1.5.0 includes Iceberg 1.11, let’s not forget to incorporate the > > changes > > > already merged in the feature/iceberg-1.11 branch. There also might be > > one > > > or two PRs against that branch that could now be merged (I’m AFK at the > > > moment). > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Alex > > > > > > Le mer. 6 mai 2026 à 07:10, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> a > > > écrit : > > > > > > > Thanks a good point but I would say let's go best effort: if we can > > > > integrate Iceberg 1.11.0 for Polaris 1.5.0, we will do that, but we > > > should > > > > not wait. > > > > If it's not in Polaris 1.5.0, Iceberg 1.11.0 can be integrated in > > Polaris > > > > 1.6.0 (in June). > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > JB > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 5, 2026 at 6:40 PM Ajantha Bhat <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi JB, > > > > > > > > > > It looks like we’re very close to the Iceberg 1.11.0 release based > on > > > > this > > > > > thread < > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/z6krfw87qft21rt7nfrdh09qg2h03ryf > > > > >. > > > > > I’d suggest waiting for it to be included in the 1.5.0 release, > which > > > > > aligns with our timeline. > > > > > > > > > > - Ajantha > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 5, 2026 at 9:14 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov < > [email protected] > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi JB, > > > > > > > > > > > > Good idea! > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Dmitri. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 5, 2026 at 11:37 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré < > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As we discussed a few weeks ago, I propose releasing Polaris > > 1.5.0 > > > > next > > > > > > > week to maintain our monthly release cadence. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We currently have nine open issues for this milestone: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20state%3Aopen%20milestone%3A1.5.0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am starting with issue #4367 ( > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/4367) to verify all > > legal > > > > > > aspects > > > > > > > before the release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please update any issues or PRs you would like to include in > > > 1.5.0. I > > > > > > plan > > > > > > > to begin the release preparation on May 15 if no objections. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > JB > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
