Hi,
Jacqueline Rahemipour a �crit :
Hi @all,
I`ve just subscribed to this list and try to give some feedback about my experiences with OOo 1.9.89 for Linux PPC soon.
great !
Currently I can test on a IBM eServer iSeries 810 running with debian sarge.
I didn't even know it will work on such machines ! :-)
Installation of m89 went off without a hitch and my first impression was not bad. :-)
With m89 you had to use some "force" options. I perhaps have found a workaround I'll test soon, to change architecture name. And for Mandrake/Red Hat PPC users, Jim Watson gave me probably a good tip for building rpm's too.
My question is: What do you think is most important to test? Running the testtool or some special manual tests?
Hmm, not sure the testtool (nor spadmin) works, for some reasons. The most important is that the build is made *without Java* (no wizards, no help)
I have to verify a lot of things in the code before 1.4.2 from IBM works, and I cannot find any help to do this, but I begin to understand what is exactly to do.
The second reason is that, after some tries, testools crashes, and I haven't found yet why.
Of course, if you want to help me, an as_complete_as_possible list of most important bugs has always to be done.
And you're welcome if you coul'd help me :)
For your information, I just co m92 code, but I'm waiting to see m92 ready before to start the build. Not sure everything will be as fine as for m89, but I'll try. As usual in both fr/de/en-US. At least, I'll try to build...
Last but not least : thank you very much for your feedback :-)
Regards, eric bachard
-- eric bachard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> French OpenOffice.org Community developer ( Linux PPC and Mac OS X / X11) See : <http://fr.openoffice.org>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
