From: Eric Hoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 19:18:24 +0200
> > what does it mean "rc"? It suggests it is of release quality.
>
> No it doesn't.
Yes it does. RC is well known "mark" for Release Candidate.
> This servers has always been the more or lesse official Server for Mac
> OS X builds still in development. Don't know why Stefan Taxhet called
> the directory MacOSXrc back when the Server was made available.
>
> Feel free to ask him and ask for a change of the name.
Stefan, can you please rename it to e.g. MacOSX only?
> I wouldn't call Mac OS X Alpha Quality. If m79 was beta quality for
> the major plattforms then this Mac OS X build is beyond it. The
> known issues are only partly caused by OOo - and the big X11 bus is
> caused by Apple and we're even working on a solution for this.
Does sound work in it? Do all wizards work too? Does Base work correctly?
I know what is the status of MacOS X. No need to use "marketing" talk about
its quality. I only care about the technical issues.
> For the 1.1.x series we had builds on this server who were worse in
> quality then this build.
This is no argument.
--
Pavel Janík
... they keep asking "Can Emacs do this?" but the corrent question is "How
can I make Emacs to do this?"
-- Someone on /.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
