From: Eric Hoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2005 18:17:36 +0200
Hi,
[... building OOo on MacOS X is still nightmare ...]
> Ready for work?
[... MacOS X builds have *many* issues ...]
> Which OS X to use for building?
[... MacOS X versions seems to be incompatible ...]
> I personally would really like to announce it to a larger audience of
> testers and maybe any time soon a first public milestone but here
> Pavel won't agree with me and from a technical point of view I can
> understand it but not from a users point of view who wonders why he
> hasn't heard of OOo 2.0 for Mac OS X for quite a while.
As you can see from the above "summary", we are not ready for RC on MacOS X.
But I too think we should make build available for users. In fact, we
already do! Ericb provide builds, maho does and me too. So we only need to
announce them and fix issues much faster...
> But first find an agreement on that and which build should be released
> as official m113? Pavels? Mahos? Eric Bs? Florians? Tinos? Or mine?
> One of the builds out there we don't know about? The "problem" is that
> the builders I know use the same cws source but add different patches
> and that rises the above question, which build is the official one?
Official builds are provided by Sun. Sun doesn't provide MacOS
X builds. QED.
I think the discussion about "official" builds is useless right now. Lets
talk about it again once we are completely in CVS and thus without
additional patches.
--
Pavel JanÃk
Make input easy to prepare and output self-explanatory.
-- The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan & Plaugher)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
