Hi,
I'll be happy if we can get rid of STLport anyway.
Oliver
Stephan Bergmann wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75046
Issue #|75046
Summary|Porting stlport for .NET 2005 64 bit compiler
Component|porting
Version|680m203
Platform|PC
URL|
OS/Version|Windows Vista
Status|NEW
Status whiteboard|
Keywords|
Resolution|
Issue type|TASK
Priority|P3
Subcomponent|code
Assigned to|obo
Reported by|obo
Hi all,
Reading this, I was just wondering whether, in general, it would make
sense for completely new platforms to not use our STLport but rather the
standard libraries that come with the respective compiler (if they are
complete enough, which I assume is the case by now). (Of course, that
would mean that we have to clean up STLport-specific constructs in our
code base, but the more portable the better, anyway.)
-Stephan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
