On 02/03/2007, at 7:43 PM, Oliver Bolte wrote:
Hi,
I'll be happy if we can get rid of STLport anyway.
Oliver
Stephan Bergmann wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=75046
Issue #|75046
Summary|Porting stlport for .NET 2005 64 bit
compiler
Component|porting
Version|680m203
Platform|PC
URL|
OS/Version|Windows Vista
Status|NEW
Status whiteboard|
Keywords|
Resolution|
Issue type|TASK
Priority|P3
Subcomponent|code
Assigned to|obo
Reported by|obo
Hi all,
Reading this, I was just wondering whether, in general, it would
make sense for completely new platforms to not use our STLport but
rather the standard libraries that come with the respective
compiler (if they are complete enough, which I assume is the case
by now). (Of course, that would mean that we have to clean up
STLport-specific constructs in our code base, but the more
portable the better, anyway.)
-Stephan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
So... what is the significance of this rather scary comment in
configure?
Warning!!, --without-stlport4 is possible with
gcc >= 3.3.3, but will break ABI
compatability
jim
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
