Yeah we should. it might be good to add "Next PIP number" to  the main page?

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 10:02 PM Jerry Peng <jerry.boyang.p...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Ok I will update the PIP number.  We should probably still list the reject
> PIP on the wiki with the other PIPs.  How else will we know what the latest
> number is.
>
> Best,
>
> Jerry
>
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 9:54 PM Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > This is a good catch!
> >
> > @Jerry Peng <jerry.p...@streaml.io> We need to change this to PIP-19.
> >
> > PIP-18 Replicator is actually rejected in favor of using Pulsar I/O
> > connector. we should still list in the PIP list but mark it as Rejected.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > - Sijie
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 9:32 PM Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Replicator -
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/wiki/PIP-18:-Pulsar-Replicator
> > >
> > > Sent from my iPhone
> > >
> > > > On Jul 19, 2018, at 4:20 PM, Jerry Peng <jerry.boyang.p...@gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Dave,
> > > >
> > > > What do you mean by two PIP-18s? Is there a another PIP-18? I can't
> > seem
> > > to
> > > > find another PIP tagged as 18.
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > >
> > > > Jerry
> > > >
> > > >> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 4:08 PM Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Hi -
> > > >>
> > > >> Interesting extension. It looks like there are two PIP-18s.
> > > >>
> > > >> Regards,
> > > >> Dave
> > > >>
> > > >>> On Jul 19, 2018, at 12:44 PM, Jerry Peng <
> > jerry.boyang.p...@gmail.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Hi everyone,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I have added a PIP for adding a SQL querying layer for Pulsar by
> > > >> leveraging
> > > >>> Presto to allow users to query data in topics.  The link to the
> PIP:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/wiki/PIP-18:-Pulsar-SQL
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Please read the document. Any feedback or suggestions is valuable!
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Best,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Jerry
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to