đź‘Ť On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 2:12 AM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net> wrote:
> OK. Nice discussion. > > It would be helpful if the disposition of the PIP-18 were stated at the > top along with references to the closed PR discussions. > > Thanks, > Dave > > > On Jul 20, 2018, at 9:21 AM, Joe F <j...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > I think 'rejected' is perhaps a misnomer. That PIP-18 was made redundant > > in favor of enhancing connectors, which was in concurrent development > at > > that time. This was discussed, and the discussion is on the PR threads > > for PIP-18 at https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/pull/1594 and > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/issues/1582 > > > > Joe > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 8:05 AM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net> > wrote: > > > >> Hi - > >> > >> I don’t see a decision made on list to reject any PIP-18? Where was that > >> decision made? > >> > >> Regards, > >> Dave > >> > >>> On Jul 19, 2018, at 10:09 PM, Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> Yeah we should. it might be good to add "Next PIP number" to the main > >> page? > >>> > >>> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 10:02 PM Jerry Peng < > jerry.boyang.p...@gmail.com > >>> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Ok I will update the PIP number. We should probably still list the > >> reject > >>>> PIP on the wiki with the other PIPs. How else will we know what the > >> latest > >>>> number is. > >>>> > >>>> Best, > >>>> > >>>> Jerry > >>>> > >>>> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 9:54 PM Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> This is a good catch! > >>>>> > >>>>> @Jerry Peng <jerry.p...@streaml.io> We need to change this to > PIP-19. > >>>>> > >>>>> PIP-18 Replicator is actually rejected in favor of using Pulsar I/O > >>>>> connector. we should still list in the PIP list but mark it as > >> Rejected. > >>>>> > >>>>> Thoughts? > >>>>> > >>>>> - Sijie > >>>>> > >>>>> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 9:32 PM Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Replicator - > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/wiki/PIP-18:- > >> Pulsar-Replicator > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Sent from my iPhone > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Jul 19, 2018, at 4:20 PM, Jerry Peng < > jerry.boyang.p...@gmail.com > >>>>> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi Dave, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> What do you mean by two PIP-18s? Is there a another PIP-18? I can't > >>>>> seem > >>>>>> to > >>>>>>> find another PIP tagged as 18. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Jerry > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 4:08 PM Dave Fisher < > dave2w...@comcast.net> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Hi - > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Interesting extension. It looks like there are two PIP-18s. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>>>> Dave > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Jul 19, 2018, at 12:44 PM, Jerry Peng < > >>>>> jerry.boyang.p...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Hi everyone, > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I have added a PIP for adding a SQL querying layer for Pulsar by > >>>>>>>> leveraging > >>>>>>>>> Presto to allow users to query data in topics. The link to the > >>>> PIP: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/wiki/PIP-18:- > Pulsar-SQL > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Please read the document. Any feedback or suggestions is > valuable! > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Jerry > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >> > >> > >
