Hi *, On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 08:31:25AM -0400, Stephen Frank wrote: > > >From a QA volunteer's perspective, I think it would also be nice to have > the user's initial reaction as to how important the bug is. That way the QA > volunteer doesn't have to make that decision for everfy single new bug. We > might not have the full 1-5 ranking (for example, we might reserve 1 for > crashes), but we could still provide a priority scale. Perhaps it could be > radio-button based. Something like:
1 is not for crashes... > How high a priority do you feel fixing this bug should be? I'd not mention the fixing in this case. Everyone thinks "my issues are so important"... > -Top priority (translates to a priority of 2) > -Regular priority (translates to a priority of 3) > -Lower priority (translates to a priority of 4) Most of this already is included in the first question. e.g. crahs vs unwanted behaviour vs typo... > This is just an example, of course. Maybe someone else has a better wording > or translation to the priority scale. I'd not offer the priority in the bug-assistant directly. > Maybe we could also have a summary of the information included on the > priority explanation page > (http://qa.openoffice.org/scdocs/ddIssues_EnterModify.html#priority) so that > the user has a good idea of what to put. People either do not read or understand these guidelines. the "we might want to reserve 1 for crashes" demonstrates this. ciao Christian -- NP: Meshuggah - Future Breed Machine Join #qa.OpenOffice.org on irc.freenode.net --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
