Hi Thorsten,
we are planning a TCM collaboration testing as soon as the m175 is
ready. Naoyuki will announce it as soon as we know when the m175 will be
ready. Hope this will help detecting and fixing the bugs in time for 2.04.
Rafaella
Thorsten Ziehm wrote On 07/06/06 09:28,:
Hi,
nearly the full set of automated testscripts ran on m173 (Windows,
Linux, Solaris Sparc and Solaris x86) and they found some regressions.
But the number is not so high. The evaluation of the errors and
warnings in the test results will take some more days. But it seems
that the
general quality of OOo is still good.
I'm optimistically that we will have fixed all regressions before
OOo2.0.4 is released. But this will also mean, that we need more QA by
the OOo community on the current builds as well. In my opinion it
isn't a problem to get the regression fixed in time, it is a problem
to find them quickly and in time.
Thorsten
Martin Hollmichel wrote On 07/05/06 17:20,:
Hi,
with m173 we integrated warnings01 and we expected some problems
around because of the high amount of changed lines of code. We used
http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66757 to track those
issues, but so far we only discovered very few issues at runtime,
most issues were raised because of slightly different build
configurations.
I'm using m173 since some time now and my impression are quite good,
is anybody on this list able to confirm my impressions with some more
real data (amount crashreports also did not raise with m173) ?
Martin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
