On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 10:32:35PM -0300, Caio Tiago Oliveira wrote:
> Christian Lohmaier, 16-03-2007 09:49:
> >On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 11:11:36AM +0900, Maho NAKATA wrote:
> [...]
> >>the Hamburg team) should left nomination process and RE process for
> >>the Hamburg team. It will take several milestones to fix MacOSX porting
> >>issue (maybe FreeBSD issues as well), but it is not a big issue of course.
> [big snip]
> >Are you really (Co-)Lead of QA?
>
> Well Christian, he's a bit busy this month and I believe he has
> overlooked at this issue (for instance, that the integrated CWS was not
> a big issue, even a bug in the product at all).
Well, he is not only lead of QA (one of the most important projects
overall, and when it comes to community distribution), he is the one who
builds the "official" Mac releases. So I really do not understand when
he writes "it is not a big issue of course" when it comes to a cws that
breaks the build being integrated.
> Christian, is there a Issue Tracker issue for this or have you only
> commented at EIS?
I commented to EIS multiple times and now have reopened the issue and
tracked down the problem. It is one of the "little change, big impact"
ones.
> >[...]
> >>That's why at this stage, nomination process for global CWS must leave
> >>for Hamburg team. In short, we cannot handle, and responsible for such
> >>a big cws.
> >
> >So because it is big, you accept that the build will break for one of
> >the platforms?
>
> We are responsible for the overall quality of the product, so it means
> we are (in some way) responsible for these such a big CWS.
Yes, and even when the community cannot run a full featured test-cycle,
it should at least care about the absolute minimum i.e. take care that
you can actually build it.
ciao
Christian
--
NP: Waltari - Showtime
Join #qa.OpenOffice.org on irc.freenode.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
