Hello Li Hua :) On 26/06/2008, at 1:24 PM, Zhu Lihua wrote:
We are about to go over the unconfirmed issues of Calc.What about the version of OOo used to test? I think lots of issues are very old.So they might not exist in the nowaday's version. And we no need to confirm it in the original versions. Does it appropriate we use the latest version? For example, DEV300m21.^ ^ not 12Or we use the stable version, such as OOo2.4? Which one is better?
We can consider 2.4 as the current stable version. So issues reported against it are still valid. You can check these against the latest build overall. An issue is also considered FIXED if upgrading to a later version fixes the problem for the user. (If you have additional time, you can check it against the latest 2.4 build, but development mainly takes place in the new version.)
Issues reported against older versions (<2.4) have lower priority. If they are reported against 2.x, you might also check them in the latest 2.4 build, but we are mostly concerned with making sure our new release fixes problems. So check first against the latest build overall.
However, this close to the 3.0 release, issues reported against "current" or 3.x have the highest priority. We want to make sure there are no major problems, which might block release.
So please check "current" and 3.x issues first, against the latest available build, and report here any which you think are major problems (completely disabling a feature, damaging data, causing crashes etc.).
To sum up: issue reported against check using priority ___________________________________________________ 3.x, current 3.0 latest 1 2.4 3.0 latest 2 < 2.4 3.0 latest 3So, please check against DEV300_m21, and focus on the issues reported against 3.0/current. Good luck with your bug-squashing. :)
from Clytie Vietnamese Free Software Translation Team http://vnoss.net/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=projects:l10n
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
