Hi Kai, I think maybe some unconfirmed issues are actually fixed in the new version. The older the version, the biger the probability. But the issues against OOo3.0 are unlikely to be fixed so fast. So starting with the latest issue might be more efficient. That's not to say we will ignore the old ones. Just a litter later.
And you needn't change the version field. Just leave them as they are. Once a time I did this, but someone corrected it to the original version. So you needn't repeat my mistake :-P Best regards, Lihua 2008-06-30 发件人： Kai 发送时间： 2008-06-30 17:08:58 收件人： [email protected] 抄送： 主题： Re: [qa-dev] About unconfirmed issues. Hi Clytie, Clytie Siddall schrieb: > Issues reported against older versions (<2.4) have lower priority. What, if an issue was reported at a time a version <2.4 was the actual version and nobody had time till today to confirm it. I can't see a reason why such an issue should have a lower priority? What about older confimed unresolved issues against 2.3.1. If they still be under 3.0 beta should I change the version in the issue tracker to 3.0 Beta? Should the version named in the issue be the one, the issue was found or better the latest version the issue exists in? Ciao, Kai --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
