On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Christian Lohmaier<[email protected]> wrote: > But I still think that (at least currently) the amount of issues found > via testscripts is so low compared to the manual ones/by people > actually using OOo.. > Of course there might be a huge difference in my perception compared > to reality - since masters are released only after they passed some of > the tests, so not sure how many problems are identified at that stage.
Right, the problems found by test scripts are probably all hidden. Automated tests are great because they prevent regressions, and make it easier for newcomers to commit changes without breaking everything. (Speaking as a Wine and Chrome developer, that is. I've never been brave enough to run the OOo test suite, it looks hard :-) - Dan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
