I'd agree that we need a new RC to pick up the ruby license fix. Is this something you're able to do Andrew please ?
Seems like we're inches from a release and it'd be great to get it out there. Marnie On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Andrew Stitcher <astitc...@redhat.com>wrote: > On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 11:05 +0000, Gordon Sim wrote: > > On 03/04/2010 07:52 PM, Andrew Stitcher wrote: > > > On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 19:15 +0000, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > > >> I didn't vote as I didn't (and still don't) think it could/should be > released without updating at least the ruby source file licence (as Gordon > already did a couple of days ago). As you note, it's been several weeks, so > I don't think that taking another few days at this point is of concern. > > > > > > You could at least vote against the release if you feel that way. Not > > > voting seems like apathy. If your vote is matched with enough other > > > people with a similar view then the release vote will fail. > > > > The point of the vote here is to ensure that there is consensus that the > > release can proceed, and no one has any concerns. > > Release votes are not about consensus, at least not in any unanimous > sense - they are votes with specific rules: majority vote; at least 3 > votes for; no vetoes. > > Andrew > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation > Project: http://qpid.apache.org > Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org > >
