On 04/14/2010 10:24 AM, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
As I have mentioned in the past, we should just publish what we have right now.
If we wait until it's perfect this will never be done.
I am not worried about dangling links. We could resolve them in time.
What we have now can't be any worse than the current wiki docs.
**So please lets publish what we have now.**
Once it's more visible more people will participate.
I agree - what we have is no worse than the current Wiki, and getting
this posted would put pressure on us all to actually use it.
I think a few days would be enough to get rid of a few embarrassing
things - I can do that next week but not this week, I'm slammed. I
suggest the following:
1. Next week, put the svn content up alongside the current Wiki, on the
home page, with a notice that the Wiki is being phased out as primary
documentation.
2. Make all changes to the svn documentation moving forward (it's OK to
make it to the Wiki too)
3. Plan to convert completely to the svn documentation in some
reasonable timeframe (to be defined). Drop the Wiki as soon as we're
convinced the svn DocBook is good enough to do so.
How does this sound?
Jonathan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]
