+1 - the sooner we get this off the ground the better. Next week sounds good to me.
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Jonathan Robie <[email protected]> wrote: > On 04/14/2010 10:24 AM, Rajith Attapattu wrote: >> >> As I have mentioned in the past, we should just publish what we have right >> now. >> If we wait until it's perfect this will never be done. >> I am not worried about dangling links. We could resolve them in time. >> >> What we have now can't be any worse than the current wiki docs. >> **So please lets publish what we have now.** >> Once it's more visible more people will participate. >> > > I agree - what we have is no worse than the current Wiki, and getting this > posted would put pressure on us all to actually use it. > > I think a few days would be enough to get rid of a few embarrassing things - > I can do that next week but not this week, I'm slammed. I suggest the > following: > > 1. Next week, put the svn content up alongside the current Wiki, on the home > page, with a notice that the Wiki is being phased out as primary > documentation. > > 2. Make all changes to the svn documentation moving forward (it's OK to make > it to the Wiki too) > > 3. Plan to convert completely to the svn documentation in some reasonable > timeframe (to be defined). Drop the Wiki as soon as we're convinced the svn > DocBook is good enough to do so. > > How does this sound? > > Jonathan > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation > Project: http://qpid.apache.org > Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected] > > -- Regards, Rajith Attapattu Red Hat http://rajith.2rlabs.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]
