We had a similar discussion when 0.8 went out and the feeling was that
issues completed during the development stream should be left marked as such
because you cant have 2 fix-for versions when resolving a JIRA, and so only
issues that were fixed after branching and updating the version would get
fix-for as the release version.

Last time we released I generated some html release notes with the content
from the 0.7 and 0.8 versions in JIRA and put them on the website. This
allows organising them a little nicer in terms of what gets more prominence,
and means the release email drives traffic to the website rather than JIRA
(which also has a side effect of being faster for the users, since JIRA is
often excruciatingly slow).

Robbie

On 10 March 2011 14:14, Gordon Sim <g...@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 03/10/2011 01:50 PM, Marnie McCormack wrote:
>
>> Hi Justin/All,
>>
>> I'm wondering what the approach for identifying the content of the 0-10
>> release from JIRA is ?
>>
>> I've just been trying to figure out what is actually in 0-10 from JIRA and
>> its not easy since we have 0-10 items complete adn I think raised during
>> the
>> release process and a load of open 0-9 items for which we can't tell the
>> target release.
>>
>> We should be able to generate release notes from JIRA, so should we update
>> all items in the 0-10 release to have a fix for version of 0-10 ?
>>
>
> I marked the JIRAs I fixed for 0.10 as fix-for 0.9 (the 0.10 option was
> only recently added). So I believe anything that is resolved and has fix-for
> 0.9[1] can have the fix-for updated to 0-10. Anyone know if there is a way
> to do this as a bulk update or similar?
>
> [1]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310520&version=12315382
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
> Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
> Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to