On 31 March 2011 18:36, Gordon Sim <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 03/18/2011 03:56 PM, Justin Ross wrote: > >> On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Robert Godfrey wrote: >> >> I know Gordon said: >>> >>> >>> "Specifically I'd suggest that unless anyone has specific updates to the >>> following artefacts - and volunteers to verify the artefact for the >>> release >>> - we remove them from the published list: >>> >>> qpid-dotnet-0-8-0.10-beta.zip >>> qpid-dotnet-0-10-0.10-beta. >>> zip >>> qpid-ruby-0.10-beta.tar.gz >>> >>> This will avoid giving false impressions about ongoing maintenance for >>> these >>> clients" >>> >>> But I think that if we are going to actually do this, we should formally >>> vote for it, and move the codebases for these artefacts into an "attic" >>> directory or similar. >>> >>> I'm not against removing unloved and unmaintained code... but I do >>> feel that >>> we should vote before adding or removing artefacts to/from the release. >>> >> >> Okay. I'll restore these to RC2 unless there's a vote to remove them. >> > > I would find it hard to vote for a new release that contained those > artefacts unless someone could justify it through a list of changes made[1] > (this would also have the benefit of identifying possible maintainers for > those components to whom questions of support could be directed). I.e. I > think that a vote will be required to keep them in, and it would be > unfortunate to stall the whole release. > > However I do agree that some more explicit 'consensus gathering' on this is > important since my previous mail did not result in any comments or > responses. Therefore... > > ...please reply with your +1 / -1 vote, or cross one of the boxes for each > of the cases below: > > (a) > > [ X ] +1, qpid-dotnet-0-8-0.10 SHOULD be removed from the 0.10 release > [ ] -1, qpid-dotnet-0-8-0.10 should NOT be removed from the 0.10 release > (please list changes it includes to support this vote) > > (b) > > [ X ] +1, qpid-dotnet-0-10-0.10 SHOULD be removed from the 0.10 release > [ ] -1, qpid-dotnet-0-10-0.10 should NOT be removed from the 0.10 release > (please list changes it includes to support this vote) > > (c) > > [ X ] +1, qpid-ruby-0.10 SHOULD be removed from the 0.10 release > [ ] -1, qpid-ruby-0.10 should NOT be removed from the 0.10 release (please > list changes it includes to support this vote) > > > [1] My JIRA query may be at fault, but I can't see any JIRA for any of > those components fixed for 0.9/0.10 > > Robbie
