> On 2011-04-20 18:04:37, Chug Rolke wrote:
> > 1. To be complete the equality tests must propagate to the .NET binding as 
> > well. See patch below.
> > 
> > 2. This patch changes the API/ABI a little does it not? 
> >    For the .NET case assume you have Duration A(100) and Duration B(100). 
> >    Before this patch A==B is false and after this patch A==B is true.
> >    How can we sell that?
> > 
> > -Chuck
> > 
> > 
> > Index: qpid/cpp/bindings/qpid/dotnet/src/Duration.h
> > ===================================================================
> > --- qpid/cpp/bindings/qpid/dotnet/src/Duration.h    (revision 1089977)
> > +++ qpid/cpp/bindings/qpid/dotnet/src/Duration.h    (working copy)
> > @@ -81,8 +81,18 @@
> >              Duration ^ result = gcnew Duration(multiplier * 
> > dur->Milliseconds);
> >              return result;
> >          }
> > -   };
> >  
> > +        static bool operator == (Duration ^ a, Duration ^ b)
> > +        {
> > +            return a->Milliseconds == b->Milliseconds;
> > +        }
> > +
> > +        static bool operator != (Duration ^ a, Duration ^ b)
> > +        {
> > +            return a->Milliseconds != b->Milliseconds;
> > +        }
> > +};
> > +
> >      public ref class DurationConstants sealed
> >      {
> >     private:
> >

As far as c++ API/ABI goes this is purely additive (it is a change but can't 
break anything). Prior to this change comparing two durations for equality 
would fail to compile due to the lack of equality operator.

I would expect though that the semantic change from a .NET perspective would 
not only be acceptable but actually desired, no?


- Gordon


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/627/#review506
-----------------------------------------------------------


On 2011-04-20 16:47:00, Gordon Sim wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/627/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2011-04-20 16:47:00)
> 
> 
> Review request for qpid, Andrew Stitcher, Alan Conway, Chug Rolke, and Steve 
> Huston.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> Fixes ttl overflow on the broker. Added equality operator for 
> qpid::messaging::Duration (needed it in test and seemed generally valuable).
> 
> 
> This addresses bug QPID-3222.
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3222
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   /trunk/qpid/cpp/include/qpid/messaging/Duration.h 1090157 
>   /trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/broker/Message.cpp 1090157 
>   /trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/messaging/Duration.cpp 1090157 
>   /trunk/qpid/cpp/src/tests/MessagingSessionTests.cpp 1090157 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/627/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> New test added, make check passes.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gordon
> 
>

Reply via email to