On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 12:59:44PM -0400, Chuck Rolke wrote: > Is there a plan for qpid/cpp/bindings/qpid/dotnet? You seem to have missed > that one.
Not intentionally skipped, I was just looking at the qpid bindings when I wrote up the original. > I'd suggest that the dotnet binding should reside with the rest of the > bindings despite its non-swig nature. The dotnet binding is tightly coupled > to the cpp/src tree so moving the binding will involve changing directory > specs in the project files and in the packaging scripts. I'll definitely lean on you to help me with that aspect of moving things when it comes around. -- Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc. Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors. http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
pgp6UD1JORXLH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
