On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 02:11:51PM -0400, Andrew Stitcher wrote: > > The big benefit to this would be breaking the Cmake dependencies between > > the bindings and the cpp build tree. We could build them independently, > > which is a Good Thing (tm). > > I don't think you are really breaking any dependencies by moving code > around are you? The bindings will still depend on the c++ code where > ever it lives in the tree.
What I was thinking was that, by moving the bindings out and then versioning the SWIG wrapper code we could build the individual language bindings separately rather than having to build all of Qpid to get them. I'm still not totally comfortable with the idea of versioning those wrappers. -- Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc. Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors. http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
pgp9DKYkCzlAY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
