Okay, I defer to you. Last call: does anyone with a java-broker focus
wish to object?
Justin
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
Although it is an extension, since it is a fairly useful but trivial change
(good chunks of the diff are actually due to removing an unecessary
field/parameter) for a new management plugin which hasn't been present
previously and isn't required for broker operation, I would tend to argue
it presents such a low level of risk to the release as to justify its
inclusion more than many of the changes so far.
Robbie
On 18 July 2012 00:17, Justin <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi, Alex. Since this is a feature addition (well, an extension) and not a
bug fix, and since we've already produced the beta, I tend to think this
one should wait for 0.20.
Justin
On Fri, 13 Jul 2012, Oleksandr Rudyy wrote:
Hi Justin,
Could you also consider inclusion of commit
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?**rev=1361239&view=rev<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1361239&view=rev>
which adds the support for HTTPS protocol into Java Broker REST
interfaces and web management console?
Kind Regards,
Alex Rudyy
------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[email protected].**org<[email protected]>
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[email protected].**org<[email protected]>
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
