[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13528300#comment-13528300
]
Rajith Attapattu commented on QPID-4497:
----------------------------------------
As to your original question about a test for this specific case (of being able
to override subscription queue properties) exists ?
The answer to that question is we do have a test.
As to whether we have adequate coverage for assertion and error handling in
general, then the answer is no. There was a gap (and possibly more) and the
fact that this issue was masked is a case in point. We do have assert tests
that are used as part of other tests, but not enough IMO.
As mentioned in QPID-4496 I think we need a better set of tests for this area
and I'm looking at it atm.
> [Java client] Exclusive property for the subscription queue cannot be
> overridden using the address string
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: QPID-4497
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4497
> Project: Qpid
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Java Client
> Affects Versions: 0.18, 0.20
> Reporter: Rajith Attapattu
> Assignee: Rajith Attapattu
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: addressing
> Fix For: 0.21
>
>
> There have been requests to allow the customization of the subscription
> queue. However there was an issue as the exclusive property wasn't set
> properly due to a bug.
> amq.topic/test; {link: {name:my-queue, durable:true,
> x-declare:{exclusive:false, auto-delete:false}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
