On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Justin Ross <[email protected]> wrote: >> What would your thoughts on a way forward be? > > Well, there's the 0.22.1 path, which isn't addressed here. I don't > think there's anything wrong with doing that. > > It's clear that you are willing to own the outcome, so in the end it > only makes sense to let you do with the RCs what you want.
I should add: If you'd like to adjust the schedule (in this case adding RCs, or adding more time between RCs), I'm not opposed to that at all. Justin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
