On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Robbie Gemmell <[email protected]> wrote: > I was about to ask if you could elaborate on what you meant in my other > reply when I saw this mail arive to answer my question. > > At this point we don't really anticpate requiring extra time in the overall > schedule (which if I'm following right, seems to be on track for RC2 end of > this week, RC3 end of next week, vote the week after if all is good?). > Moving RC2 to Monday might let us get some more final changes into it, but > I understand if you'd like to release it on Friday in case anyone else > wants to hack on things at the weekend :)
To be frank, I think it's inadvisable to make improvements this late, even if you're careful, without adding more time in the schedule for testing. Unintended consequences happen to everyone. That said, I'm not in the best position to judge the risk here; you and Rob are. By saying "you'll own the outcome", I mean that I have faith that if there does end up being a problem, you'll handle it. No problem here deferring RC2 to Monday. Just so there are no coordination hangups, you should make the changes discussed here at your discretion. Justin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
