On 10 April 2013 17:27, Justin Ross <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Justin Ross <[email protected]> wrote: > >> What would your thoughts on a way forward be? > > > > Well, there's the 0.22.1 path, which isn't addressed here. I don't > > think there's anything wrong with doing that. > > > > It's clear that you are willing to own the outcome, so in the end it > > only makes sense to let you do with the RCs what you want. > > I should add: If you'd like to adjust the schedule (in this case > adding RCs, or adding more time between RCs), I'm not opposed to that > at all. > > Justin > > I was about to ask if you could elaborate on what you meant in my other reply when I saw this mail arive to answer my question.
At this point we don't really anticpate requiring extra time in the overall schedule (which if I'm following right, seems to be on track for RC2 end of this week, RC3 end of next week, vote the week after if all is good?). Moving RC2 to Monday might let us get some more final changes into it, but I understand if you'd like to release it on Friday in case anyone else wants to hack on things at the weekend :) Robbie
