On 12/16/2013 06:13 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 12/16/2013 07:29 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
On 16 December 2013 18:54, Alan Conway <acon...@redhat.com> wrote:
The following are processed by various programs, I don't know if there's a
safe comment syntax. Can we get an exemption for such files?
QPID_VERSION.txt
cpp/QPID_VERSION.txt
The above seem reasonable as they contain only a version number. The below
I would guess depends on what is in them and how they are used, none of
which I have any knowledge of I'm afraid.
cpp/src/qpid.linkmap
The linker script can apparently take C-style comments (/* xyz */). Though its
tiny, it does contain build instructions.
cpp/src/qmf2.pc.in
cpp/src/qpid.pc.in
pkg conf files themselves can take comments in the form of lines starting with
'#' and I'm pretty sure the processing of these templates by cmake won't be
affected by the comments either. Not sure there would be any strong argument
that these required a license, but it may be simpler to just add it.
Done on trunk and 0.26
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r1551622 | aconway | 2013-12-17 11:54:02 -0500 (Tue, 17 Dec 2013) | 10 lines
QPID-5255: Add missing licenses in qpid/cpp tree.
Added licenses to:
qpid/cpp/src/qmf2.pc.in
qpid/cpp/src/qpid.linkmap
qpid/cpp/src/qpid.pc.in
From trunk r1551620
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@qpid.apache.org
