On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 16:18 -0500, Ted Ross wrote: > On 02/25/2016 03:57 PM, Alan Conway wrote: > > I like this a lot. > > > > The directional terms are still a problem. "source/sink" clashes > > with > > AMQP "source/target". "inTreatment/outTreatment" is confusing > > because > > "treatment" covers message and link treatments, but they don't > > always > > flow in the same direction. E.g. > > > > outTreatment: linkBalanced > > > > "out" refers to *outbound* messages, but "linkBalanced" means > > balance > > the *inbound* receiver link-open requests across external servers. > > This > > made my head hurt. > > "out" refers to the outbound leg of the route. In this case it > means > that messages flow out from the topic via links established by the > consumers.
Yes I get that now, but it is hard to read (or was for me.) When I see "out" I think of messages flowing out of the router to the client - all good. When I see "balanced" I think of a flow of things being distributed over a set of targets. And I already have a flow of outbound things in mind so I feel like I might be understanding something. But the things that are being balanced are not the *out*bound messages but the *in*bound link open requests. My brain can't turn around that fast. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
