I'll see if I can reproduce the problem with the typed version. At Wed, 20 Oct 2010 07:48:20 -0700, John Clements wrote: > Also, very late flash of insight: my response (getting rid of > unsafe-vector-ref and unsafe-vector-set!) might explain my performance > issues with the FFT library.
I doubt so. While porting this code to Typed Racket, I measured the effect of the different classes of unsafe operations on it, and unsafe vector operations had no noticeable effect. Vincent _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
