At Fri, 22 Oct 2010 21:31:43 -0600, Doug Williams wrote: > Matthew, would it make more sense to have unsafe-vector-ref (and related > functions) be the more general function and unsafe-vector*-ref be the one > that doesn't work on chaperoned vectors? That is just swap the definitions. > That way user code that is already using unsafe-vector-ref (etc) will > continue to work.
Ok, let's swap them --- even for 5.0.2. _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
