On Jan 14, 2011, at 5:33 PM, Matthias Felleisen wrote: > Two complaints in one day about the wording of these clauses. Let's do > something about the English.
Agreed. > I have another one, unrelated: I don't like the 'self-blame'. I have > encountered this now a couple of times, and I think we should use the Eiffel > terminology of > > promised > required > ensured > > etc. This may just appeal to non-Racketeers when they see the contract > violation reports. Also agreed. I'll see about coming up with an alternative over the weekend and sending out examples over the list before I make the change in the repository. Stevie _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
