On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Stevie Strickland <sstri...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > On Jan 14, 2011, at 5:24 PM, Casey Klein wrote: > >> Regardless, though, I still think we need some way to re-export a >> contracted value that makes the re-importer the negative party on the >> contract. > > I'm not necessarily in disagreement, but currently I think this should be an > explicit action.
Explicit is fine with me. I just want to avoid giving names to all the contracts and re-applying them in the re-provider. _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
