Two reactions: 1. I think we should stay away from 'stream' here. If Racket had grown out of the Unix tradition, I'd be fine with it. But we partially grew out the functional community, and they use 'stream' for a narrower concept.
2. My hunch is that immutable 'things' are what we want. So unless someone has a good example of why a vector should be a 'thing' as opposed should be converted to a 'thing', speak up now or be quiet forever. -- Matthias p.s. And I agree with Eli and you that generator should remain for what is now know as a Python concept but which appeared in Icon and Snobol decades before -- under the same name. _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
