Matthew wrote "Streams include lists and lazy lists as produced by `stream-cons' (i.e., the usual one instead of the one currently exported by `racket/stream')."
so I think the answer is 1. Robby On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Matthias Felleisen <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mar 17, 2011, at 3:38 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote: > >> At Thu, 17 Mar 2011 15:34:17 -0400, Matthias Felleisen wrote: >>> 1. I think we should stay away from 'stream' here. >>> If Racket had grown out of the Unix tradition, I'd >>> be fine with it. But we partially grew out the >>> functional community, and they use 'stream' for >>> a narrower concept. >> >> Unless I'm confused, the proposal is to use "stream" in the >> functional-programming sense, not in the Unix sense. > > > Perhaps the misunderstanding is on my side but that's easy to resolve. > > What does > > (stream-first (stream-cons 1 (infinite-loop))) > > produce? > > -- Matthias > > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev > _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
