On Mar 17, 2011, at 3:38 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote: > At Thu, 17 Mar 2011 15:34:17 -0400, Matthias Felleisen wrote: >> 1. I think we should stay away from 'stream' here. >> If Racket had grown out of the Unix tradition, I'd >> be fine with it. But we partially grew out the >> functional community, and they use 'stream' for >> a narrower concept. > > Unless I'm confused, the proposal is to use "stream" in the > functional-programming sense, not in the Unix sense.
Perhaps the misunderstanding is on my side but that's easy to resolve. What does (stream-first (stream-cons 1 (infinite-loop))) produce? -- Matthias _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
