On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org> wrote: > Two minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote: >> FWIW, it would make sense to me if TR's regexp-match function >> accepted only regexps in the first argument (ditto for Racket and >> then Scracket could take strings (which of course are hashes mapping >> integers to chars)). > > I think that Sam's usual policy for that is to make things as close to > Racket as possible. (And I think that it's a good policy in general.)
I know. > > As for Scratchit (obviously the right spelling), it does sound like a > good idea, but the nice thing about the untyped -> TR route is that > you get to keep your code, whereas a Scratchit thing would be useless > if you can't use the libraries. Yes, that would be in the plan. _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev