re-search [!!== hack]
On Apr 18, 2011, at 12:37 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote: > I don't know what that means... > > (FWIW, I don't think that it works to come up with a way of > translating values back and forth since the overhead would make it > much less useful.) > > > 20 minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote: >> I dunno. Do some search again-ing? >> >> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org> wrote: >>> 50 minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote: >>>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org> wrote: >>>>> As for Scratchit (obviously the right spelling), it does sound >>>>> like a good idea, but the nice thing about the untyped -> TR route >>>>> is that you get to keep your code, whereas a Scratchit thing would >>>>> be useless if you can't use the libraries. >>>> >>>> Yes, that would be in the plan. >>> >>> How would you do that? > > -- > ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: > http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
