Four minutes ago, Neil Van Dyke wrote: > > A performance regression in "assq" would adversely impact some > performance-sensitive legacy code that saw a lot of micro-optimizing > last year. Having the old "assq" available as a fallback option > would be reassuring.
Related to the other thing I said: if you have code that depends on fast assoc-ing, and you don't have cycles, then rolling your own version is probably going to be faster anyway. -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev