Thanks for the performance numbers and JIT enhancements, Matthew.
Do I read this correctly that (for whatever distributions of inputs you used) we can expect the new "assq" to be about twice as fast on 64-bit x86, and about half-again as slow on 32-bit?
Matthew Flatt wrote at 04/24/2011 10:44 AM:
32-bit run: 'kern:assq cpu time: 23 real time: 23 gc time: 0 cpu time: 38 real time: 39 gc time: 0 cpu time: 39 real time: 38 gc time: 0 'assq cpu time: 38 real time: 39 gc time: 0 cpu time: 60 real time: 61 gc time: 0 cpu time: 61 real time: 61 gc time: 0
64-bit run: 'kern:assq cpu time: 36 real time: 36 gc time: 0 cpu time: 117 real time: 117 gc time: 0 cpu time: 118 real time: 118 gc time: 0 'assq cpu time: 39 real time: 39 gc time: 0 cpu time: 66 real time: 65 gc time: 0 cpu time: 65 real time: 65 gc time: 0
-- http://www.neilvandyke.org/ _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
