On May 20, 2011, at 11:55 AM, Robby Findler wrote: > Would it make sense to have a new construct, say letrec-super-star, > that did one of those things and then use that as the core form in > Racket (that's also a big change, but probably smaller than changing > letrec itself).
One day we should reduce the language not just add to it. A language is not only about the positive things you can say but also about the negative ones. _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
